Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Travis' Review of Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut


Over the weekend I completed Vonnegut's most famous work, Slaughterhouse-Five, also known as Slaughterhouse-Five, or The Children’s Crusade: A Duty Dance with Death, by Kurt Vonnegut, a Fourth-Generation German-American Now Living in Easy Circumstances on Cape Cod [and Smoking Too Much], Who, as an American Infantry Scout Hors de Combat, as a Prisoner of War, Witnessed the Fire Bombing of Dresden, Germany, ‘The Florence of the Elbe,’ a Long Time Ago, and Survived to Tell the Tale. This Is a Novel Somewhat in the Telegraphic Schizophrenic Manner of Tales of the Planet Tralfamadore, Where the Flying Saucers Come From. Peace.

As can be inferred from the second humorous title, Slaughterhouse-Five is not meant to be taken completely seriously. The main event of the novel is the horrible fire-bombing of Dresden, Germany in WWII, in which 25,000 were made casualties. The protagonist Billy Pilgrim survives the leveling of the city by fortune of being in a meat locker at the time of the bombing. However, Vonnegut balances this tragedy with quirky science fiction: Billy is abducted by a race of aliens known as the Tralfamadorians who see in 4 dimensions and consider life as a whole rather than an instantaneous snapshot of the present. Billy also becomes "unstuck in time" and time travels to different moments in his life and lives them out accordingly.

Mrs. Elliott told me she had never read SH-5 because she was nervous about what she heard of Vonnegut's stream-of-consciousness like approach and sporadic, timeline defying delivery. However, I found that Vonnegut was charmingly simple to read and I powered through the novel without getting snagged on any stylistic quarks. Vonnegut uses many line breaks throughout the text to separate his nonlinear thoughts which allows the reader's eye to reset.

For me, SH-5 has its most revealing messages on the topic of the inevitability of death, and treats it with a very stoic nonchalance. Every death in the novel is followed by the line "So it goes.", blunting death's effect. It's hard not to find the book funny at times, despite its gravity. Billy is put at peace by the Tralfamadorian view of never-ending life, and even predicts and accepts his own demise. The Tralfamadorians, in their 4th dimensional wisdom, also advocate returning to the best moments of life and seeing them as eternal fixtures in a chain of events.

Admittedly, I first treated the book as science fiction, accepting that Billy was abducted by aliens from Tralfamadore and had really become unstuck in time. However, as I finished the book, it dawned on me that Billy had gone insane from what he had seen in the war, and his time travel was merely a delusion of a PTSD-stricken mind. The book became much more powerful to me after this realization.

I would recommend SH-5 to anyone, as it has been unlike any book I've read before. It is of the post-modern style, so it should be a new experience to anyone whose literary journey has been predominantly limited to the high school canon like my experience was. SH-5 was very refreshing to read and I hope to explore Vonnegut's other works in the near future.

-Travis S.

6 comments:

  1. So, much, words, so litte meaning that I can comprehend. That is not to say that the post is without meaning, it is quite possible that the post is so packed full of meaning that it's deserving of a pulitzer, or hugo, or whatever, of course, since I have no information either way, it is also possible that it is, in fact, meaningless. That said, it is quite ... "apparent" that to properly ... "understand" the post, that one would have to first read the book in question, as there seems to be quite a few references to the book which I have not yet read, and yet, had I actully read that book, I would not be here, quite a quandry.

    Of course, providing a truely in depth critique designed to embetter, or maybe even BETTERFY, the errm, writification, would entail actual expenditure of EFFORT. Effort expanded is not of itself wastefull, but considering I will be expected to post 28 such comments over a period of some 14 weeks it might be expected that I, rather than putting all my effort into one groundshaking project and then coasting on it for the rest of the semester, would rather simply start coasting immediently.

    Bonus points if you can guess from whence writification.

    ---K. Lin

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ken you spelled "wasteful" wrong.

      -Anonymous

      Delete
  2. I was almost too horrified, daunted by the intellect of the previous comment, to post. However, I will try to utilize my effort to its fullest capacity and not put it to waste.

    Anyway, to the actual meat of the post. The novel highlighted above does seem extremely complex and interesting. The sharp social critique within the novel seems justified as the trauma that the character was forced to endure made him experience something, although delusional, that nobody could ever dream of, nonetheless encounter.

    As mentioned by Travis above, the protagonist began to accept death as a viable option—a novel, but terrifying perspective. The one thing that every human being can be characterized by is by the animalistic instinct to survive. The horrors of war decimated that will to live. That very will to see the sun rise again and that pushes us through our deepest lows was completely eliminated because of war. Vonnegut criticizes society for being irresponsible and, with the humor, idiotic for allowing such atrocities to happen: allowing fellow human beings to kill one another just for power.

    I've never heard of the novel or author, but with his refreshing style of critique, I am now very intrigued.

    --K. Lo

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. As a post-modern work, I feel Vonnegut's stream-of-consciousness style is something that would appeal more to a reader in search of character inquiry; that being said, it seems SH-5 is an excellent book to see the effects of trauma on human psychology and perception.

    The fact that Billy establishes a comfort zone with death is something that has dark accents to it. Vonnegut's message is extremely powerful with a more unique approach: the humorous outtake of a character experiencing extraterrestrial life. I feel that in an of itself, SH-5 is a commentary on the human mind's ability to dynamically conform to trauma that is induced both physically and mentally. Being able to find comfort in death is something that requires maturity and character development, something Vonnegut explores by criticizing the human race's tenacity for mutual destruction.

    Very excellent review, and SH-5 is now on my reading list.

    -D. Vyas

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete